The return of these characters was teased in The Rings of Power season 2’s trailer, offering audiences a look at the next step in Galadriel’s epic journey. As one of many upcoming Lord of the Rings shows and movies, The Rings of Power will continue bridging the gap between the Second and Third Ages of Middle-earth. One way in which the show will do this is by introducing a new character to the show, though one that is all too familiar to the world of Tolkien. In doing so, the biggest mistake of Jackson’s first movie is being rectified.
Peter Jackson’s Lord Of The Rings Trilogy Cutting Tom Bombadil Hurt The Movies
The Mysterious Tom Bombadil Was Not Part Of Jackson’s First Movie
The character in question is none other than fan-favorite Tom Bombadil. The character has long been a mysterious inclusion in J.R.R. Tolkien’s universe, primarily due to his lack of care for the world beyond the borders of his forest, and the fact that the One Ring has absolutely no effect on him. This led many to desire an appearance by Bombadil in live-action upon the announcement of Jackson’s The Fellowship of the Ring. However, Peter Jackson and his writing team – Fran Walsh and Phillipa Boyens – decided against including Bombadil in The Lord of the Rings.
The reasoning behind this choice is sound enough, with Jackson imploring that Bombadil has no bearing on the plot of the trilogy, something Tolkien himself once stated. That said, Bombadil’s absence somewhat hurt The Fellowship of the Ring regarding some fan backlash. As alluded to, Bombadil is a cult icon of sorts in the world of Tolkien fandom, with many citing the decision to cut him from the trilogy as one of the biggest mistakes Jackson made. As rare as criticisms of the trilogy are, cutting Bombadil’s role is one that commonly rears its head concerning book accuracy.
The Rings Of Power Can Do Justice To Tom Bombadil After His Movie Absence
Tom Bombadil’s First Live-Action Lord Of The Rings Appearance Can Offer Redemption
Decades on from the release of The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, Bombadil is finally receiving his fair share of justice. In May 2024, the announcement came that The Rings of Power season 2 had cast Rory Kinnear as Tom Bombadil, shocking the Tolkien fandom. Bombadil’s appearance was not overly expected in The Rings of Power, primarily due to the character’s only book appearances coming in the Third Age of Middle-earth rather than the Second Age. Nonetheless, Bombadil will appear in The Rings of Power season 2, offering justice for his absence in the Jackson movies.
Bombadil was depicted as a wandering pilgrim of the Second Age in Tolkien’s works, meaning his Rings of Power inclusion can fit into Middle-earth canon.
Finally, Tom Bombadil is going to be explored in a live-action Lord of the Rings property. The character who has become so beloved by fans of Tolkien’s works will have a somewhat active role in the story of a Lord of the Rings project, tied to The Stranger and Nori Brandyfoot in season 2 of the Amazon Prime show. Jackson had the limitation of a film runtime which factored into his cutting of Bombadil, yet The Rings of Power offers longer-form storytelling, meaning the mysterious being can be justifiably included.
Why Jackson’s LOTR Movies Cutting Tom Bombadil Was Secretly A Good Thing
Bombadil’s Absence Was A Criticism Of Jackson’s Lord Of The Rings, Though One That Served The Story
Although Bombadil being cut from Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy is a regular complaint of the Oscar-winning films, it was undoubtedly a good choice from the director and his writing team. As alluded to, Bombadil simply has no influence on the overarching plot of The Lord of the Rings whatsoever. In the original novel, Bombadil saves Frodo, Sam, Merry, and Pippin from dangers like Old Man Willow and Barrow-wights before telling them he cares little about the outside world, singing some songs, and sending the Hobbits on their perilous journey, never to be seen again.
Jackson felt that including a character who has complete power of the One Ring was contradictory, as much of the first film… focused on how the Ring dominated the minds of everyone who came close to it.
With the limited constraints of runtime in a movie as vast and dense as The Fellowship of the Ring, cutting a character who has no outright impact on the plot makes a lot of sense. Another reason Jackson cut Bombadil was, ironically, something that makes the character so interesting. Jackson felt that including a character who has complete power of the One Ring was contradictory, as much of the first film – and the trilogy as a whole – focused on how the Ring dominated the minds of everyone who came close to it.
Showing Bombadil to completely resist the power of the Ring would have not only lessened the evil, malevolent nature of the titular jewelry, but it would have raised questions over why he could not have taken the Ring to Mordor himself. For these reasons, Bombadil’s absence only better served the story of Jackson’s Lord of the Rings adaptation. With The Rings of Power, however, the longer form of TV allows Bombadil to be depicted better. Time constraints will not be as prevalent, and capturing Bombadil’s spirit from the novel as an unknown personification of nature in Middle-earth will be much easier.
News
Meghan Markle warning as insider reveals ‘gloves are off’ with rumours of next bombshell
The Sussexes were snubbed from an invite to Balmoral Castle, which may have been the last straw for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. The couple may have hit their last straw (Image: Getty) Meghan Markle has been open with struggles of mental…
Prince William and Harry’s feud continues leaving King Charles with a tough decision to make
It appears that Prince William and Harry are no closer to reconciling their bitter feud, despite their father, King Charles, holding onto hope. A well-known royal author has revealed that King Charles is “extremely sad” over the ongoing rift between his sons. As he continues cancer treatment, King Charles is more…
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s royal titles at risk as King convenes Balmoral summit
If Harry were to lose his Prince title that would mean Archie and Lilibet could also lose theirs, but they would be able to use the Dumbarton titles while their parents will be known simply as the Sussexes. Prince Harry and Meghan…
Ultra rare footage of King Charles’ Christening from 1948 showing four generations of the royal family is found at thrift shop for less than £7
A man has revealed how he discovered ultra rare footage of King Charles‘ Christening in a thrift shop – for less than £7. Ronald Baxter Jr, 59, from Charleston, South Carolina, has been collecting since he was 10 years old and…
Kate Middleton ‘made phone call’ to Meghan at King’s request to ‘clear the air’ after Royal racism claims
Kate Middleton contacted Meghan Markle to address racism allegations after Omid Scobie’s book, claims insider. Kate Middleton reportedly contacted Meghan Markle following the explosive allegations of racism levelled against the royal family including her. The Duchess of Sussex had claimed that…
Prince William Just Sported a New Look That Was Previously Discouraged — and Sparked Tension with Prince Harry
The Prince of Wales, who appeared in a new video with Princess Kate, hasn’t been seen with facial hair since 2008 Prince William is experimenting with a new look this summer, one that has been at the center of a hairy…
End of content
No more pages to load