In a new witness testimony, Harry calls out a 2002 article that reported a plot to “steal a sample” of his DNA in an attempt to confirm if or not King Charles III was his biological father.
Prince Harry slammed “cruel” rumors speculating that King Charles III is not his biological father.
This week, the Duke of Sussex took to the stand in London as part of a phone-hacking lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspaper Limited (MGN) — the publishers behind the Daily Mirror, the People, and the Sunday Mirror.
In the suit, Harry, along with other public figures, claims that journalists from MGN’s various outlets exploited a security gap in order to gain access to his personal voicemails from friends and family. The group has denied this accusation.
Adrian Dennis / AFP via Getty Images
Advertisement
The Prince’s decision to testify in the major trial marks an unprecedented move for a senior member of the Royal Family. However, given his complicated relationship with the British media, it comes as no surprise that Harry is using this opportunity to air his frustrations.
Wpa Pool / Getty Images
As well as taking to the stand, a 55-page witness statement was released on Tuesday, in which Harry details various times in his life that he suspects journalists at the newspaper group used unlawful methods to gather information for stories about him.
Wpa Pool / Getty Images
Advertisement
At one point in the written statement, Harry references a December 2002 article published by the People, titled, “Plot to rob the DNA of Harry,” which he explains reported “a plot to steal a sample of my DNA to test my parentage.”
Anwar Hussein / Getty Images
He writes that numerous papers around this time reported a rumor claiming that his real father was Major James Hewitt — a man that his mother, Princess Diana, had an affair with during her marriage to King Charles III.
Mark Cuthbert / UK Press via Getty Images
It is known that Princess Diana’s affair with James Hewitt took place after Prince Harry was born — with the pair reportedly first meeting in 1986 — meaning the rumors are untrue. However, Harry said this was a fact he was unaware of at the time these reports were circulating.
Pa Images / PA Images via Getty Images
“At the time of this article and others similar to it, I wasn’t actually aware that my mother hadn’t met Major Hewitt until after I was born,” he writes, adding that he eventually learned the actual timeline of the affair years later in 2014.
Anwar Hussein / WireImage
Advertisement
He claims that the journalists working at the paper had been aware of the true timeline of events when the 2002 story was published, and therefore knew it was not possible that Hewitt was his father.
James Whatling / UK Press via Getty Images
“At the time, when I was 18 years old and had lost my mother just six years earlier, stories such as this felt very damaging and very real to me,” he writes. “They were hurtful, mean, and cruel.”
Max Mumby / Getty Images
Advertisement
Harry also recalls that he was “always left questioning the motives behind the stories,” and whether they were planted in an attempt “to put doubt into the minds of the public” so he “might be ousted from the Royal Family.”
Max Mumby / Getty Images
In the witness statement, he accuses the journalist behind the story, Dean Rousewell, of having previously used “unlawful information gathering techniques.”
Max Mumby / Getty Images
Advertisement
The Prince addressed the rumors about his parentage in his memoir, Spare, which was released at the start of this year. He claims that King Charles III would regularly make jokes about the speculation.
Princess Diana Archive / Getty Images
“Pa liked telling stories, and this was one of the best in his repertoire,” he wrote in the book. “He’d always end with a burst of philosophizing. … Who knows if I’m really the Prince of Wales? Who knows if I’m even your real father?”
Samir Hussein / Samir Hussein / WireImage
Despite this, Harry said he found the widespread teasing to be “remarkably unfunny,” adding that the media “couldn’t get enough” of the speculation. “Maybe it made them feel better about their lives that a young prince’s life was laughable,” he wrote.