Jamie Lee Curtis Attacked by Woke Freaks After Mourning Charlie Kirk Following His Assassination

In the polarized echo chambers of 2025 America, where political lines are drawn sharper than a knife’s edge, few moments cut deeper than the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The 31-year-old firebrand conservative, co-founder of Turning Point USA, and a relentless voice for MAGA ideals, was gunned down on September 10 during a speaking engagement at Utah Valley University. A single bullet to the neck, fired by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson—a self-avowed leftist radical with a manifesto decrying “fascist enablers”—ended Kirk’s life mid-sentence as he railed against campus wokeness. The nation reeled, vigils sprang up from coast to coast, and President Donald Trump declared a national day of mourning, vowing swift justice in what he called “the left’s war on patriotism.”

But amid the grief and fury, an unexpected voice emerged from Hollywood’s liberal fortress: Jamie Lee Curtis. The 66-year-old Oscar winner, known for slaying fictional monsters in the Halloween franchise and championing progressive causes like LGBTQ+ rights and gun control, broke down in tears on Marc Maron’s WTF podcast just days after the shooting. Her raw emotion, a plea for humanity over ideology, should have been a beacon of bipartisanship. Instead, it unleashed a torrent of vitriol from the very progressive circles she calls home. Branded a “traitor,” “MAGA sympathizer,” and worse, Curtis became the latest casualty in the culture wars—a liberal icon devoured by the woke mob she once fed.

The podcast episode, recorded on September 13 and released on the 15th, captured Curtis at her most vulnerable. Midway through a discussion on societal desensitization to violence—timed hauntingly close to the 24th anniversary of 9/11—she pivoted to Kirk’s death. “I’m going to bring something up with you just because it’s front of mind,” she said, her voice cracking. Mistaking his name for “Charlie Crist” in a Freudian slip she later attributed to his “deep belief in God,” Curtis choked back sobs. “I disagreed with him on almost every point I ever heard him say… but I believe he was a man of faith, and I hope in that moment when he died, that he felt connected with his faith. Even though his ideas were abhorrent to me, I still believe he’s a father and a husband and a man of faith.”

She elaborated, drawing parallels to historical traumas: the Zapruder film’s endless replays of JFK’s assassination—five years to the day before her birth—and the relentless footage of the Twin Towers falling. “I know there is video of his assassination. I know people who’ve seen it,” Curtis said, refusing to watch it herself. “We as a society are bombarded with imagery… We don’t know what the longitudinal effects are of watching his execution over and over and over again. What does that do? That kind of—I don’t ever want to see this footage of this man being shot.” Her words painted Kirk not as a political bogeyman, but as a human being—a husband to Erika, father to their young daughter, and a devout Christian whose life was snuffed out in broad daylight before a crowd of horrified students.

For many, Curtis’s tribute was a rare moment of grace. Conservatives, still raw from the loss of their young warrior, praised her as a “class act” and “proof that not all of Hollywood is lost.” Rainn Wilson of The Office fame echoed her sentiments on X, posting, “Disagreement doesn’t mean dehumanization. Charlie was a dad, a believer—gone too soon. RIP.” Even Arnold Schwarzenegger, the action star turned centrist, weighed in: “No one deserves to die for their words. Jamie’s right—faith and family transcend politics.” Vigils across the heartland featured clips of her monologue, with attendees holding signs reading “Humanity Over Hate” and “Thanks, Laurie Strode, for Slaying Division.”

Yet, in the fever swamps of progressive Twitter and Reddit, Curtis’s empathy was heresy. The backlash erupted within hours of the episode’s release, a digital pile-on that exposed the fragility of left-wing orthodoxy. Hashtags like #CancelJamieLee and #WokeBetrayal trended briefly before being drowned out by algorithmic suppression, but not before amassing thousands of venomous posts. “Crying over a fascist who called trans kids ‘demons’? Sellout!” one viral tweet from a blue-check activist snarled, garnering 15,000 likes. On Reddit’s r/Fauxmoi, a thread titled “Jamie Lee Curtis fights back tears talking about that man’s death” ballooned to 4,700 upvotes and 900 comments, with users dissecting her “crocodile tears” and accusing her of “white fragility.”

The attacks were personal and vicious. One prominent LGBTQ+ influencer, with 500,000 followers, posted a thread listing Kirk’s “sins”—his opposition to gender-affirming care, his rants against “woke indoctrination” in schools, and his support for Trump’s border policies—before branding Curtis a “boomer enabler” who “prioritizes Christian tears over queer lives.” Another, a podcaster known for anti-MAGA riffs, mocked her faith reference: “Comparing Charlie Kirk to Jesus? Next she’ll say he’s risen from the dead to vote against abortion rights. Pathetic.” Memes proliferated: Photoshopped images of Curtis as Michael Myers stabbing a rainbow flag, captioned “Halloween for Hypocrites.”

Even allies turned. A former co-star from Freakier Friday tweeted a lukewarm rebuke: “Empathy is great, but let’s not forget who Kirk voted for. Actions have consequences.” The pile-on spilled into real-world repercussions. Petitions circulated on Change.org demanding Disney recast her in upcoming projects, citing “platforming hate.” Sponsors of Maron’s podcast faced boycott calls, with one energy drink brand pulling ads after employees complained about “normalizing conservatism.” Curtis’s Instagram, usually a shrine to sobriety milestones and family photos, was flooded with death threats and slurs, forcing her to go private for 48 hours—a first in her decades-long career.

Why the fury? At its core, the meltdown reveals the left’s deepening intolerance for nuance in a post-Trump 2.0 world. Kirk wasn’t just any conservative; he was a millennial menace, building Turning Point USA into a $100 million juggernaut that mobilized Gen Z voters for the GOP. His unapologetic Christianity, family-man image, and barbs at “radical leftists” made him a lightning rod. To progressives, mourning him—even qualifiedly—equated to forgiving his “harms”: stoking anti-trans legislation, downplaying January 6 as “peaceful,” and amplifying election denialism. “She’s humanizing a monster,” one Reddit user fumed. “Where were her tears for the Uvalde kids he indirectly armed?”

Curtis’s own history amplified the betrayal. A vocal Biden surrogate in 2020, she’d lambasted Trump as a “sociopath” and advocated for assault weapon bans—positions Kirk mocked relentlessly. Her 2023 sobriety memoir, The Body Keeps the Score-inspired reflections on trauma, positioned her as a woke elder statesman. To critics, her Kirk tribute smacked of performative redemption, especially amid Hollywood’s post-strike reckoning with conservative backlash. “She’s auditioning for the middle to save her box office,” sneered a Variety op-ed, though insiders insist it was genuine: Curtis, raised in a showbiz family scarred by addiction and loss, has long preached “radical empathy” in sobriety circles.

The irony is thicker than fog in a Halloween sequel. Curtis, who built a brand on screaming down systemic evils, now faces the monster she helped create: cancel culture’s insatiable maw. Conservatives, ever opportunistic, milked the schadenfreude. Fox News ran segments titled “Liberal Tears for Kirk—Finally,” with guests like Ben Shapiro quipping, “Jamie gets it: Faith trumps feelings.” Trump himself retweeted a clip, adding, “Even Hollywood knows Charlie was a legend. The radical left? Crickets—or worse.” On X, MAGA accounts tallied “woke meltdowns” like scorecards, with one viral post reading: “Jamie cries for Kirk: 1. Leftist rage quits: Infinite.”

Broader ripples extend to Hollywood’s fault lines. The Emmys, airing days after the podcast drop, became a proxy battleground. Host Jimmy Kimmel, still smarting from his own Kirk-related suspension, quipped, “Jamie’s the only one who gets it—monsters are human until they’re not.” But offstage, whispers of blacklisting swirled: Agents advised clients to “stay silent” on Kirk lest they alienate streaming overlords. Meanwhile, right-leaning stars like Jon Voight and James Woods rallied to Curtis’s defense, with Woods posting, “Brave lady in a den of vipers. Respect.”

As of September 19, the dust hasn’t settled. Curtis has yet to respond publicly, but sources close to her tell TMZ she’s “heartbroken by the hate” and considering a follow-up essay on empathy’s cost. Robinson, the assassin, remains in custody, his silence fueling conspiracy theories from both sides. Turning Point USA presses on under Kirk’s widow, Erika, who dedicated their latest summit to “those who mourn without apology.”

This episode underscores a grim truth: In America’s fractured soul, even a widow’s tears can spark civil war. Curtis’s “crime” wasn’t hypocrisy—it was humanity. By reminding us that villains have families, faiths, and final breaths, she exposed the woke freakout for what it is: not justice, but jihad against dissent. As vigils fade and trials loom, her sobs echo a plea: Can we grieve without grudge? Or are we doomed to devour our own?

Related Posts

Our Privacy policy

https://reportultra.com - © 2025 Reportultra